| 
 
 | 
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: |   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 1 | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |  
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |  |   
    | Weighed
      Average (?):  (6.5/10) |   
    | Average 
      Rating:  (8/10) |   
    | Highest 
      Rating:  (8/10) |   
    | Lowest 
      Rating:  (8/10) |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    Faibhar
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Feb 28, 2004 |   
    |  | When hasn't one wondered of the secret life of Russel Crowe? (Any misspelling is quite intentional, and of course, you are most welcome. What a wonderful way to  mind unblock. More would do well to enjoy a similar outlet). Well, maybe some have but to get back on point regarding this poem, it is fine. Readers would do well to enjoy this delightful change of pace. (8/10)
 
 |  
    |  |  
        Replied by: 
L'étranger
  (Edit)  (Feb 28, 2004)Thankyou Faibhar! While Russell wasn't the muse for this one, what began as one part - up to the first division - ended up becoming more. Originally posted in another 'general' forum, the subsequent (2nd and so on) parts were my responses to what a male actually responded to, and while I had to exclude those parts for their own privacy, I have to say without that input 'L'homme' would not have become what it did become.
 I don't fancy myself as a poet in the everday sense, but I find that verse-like form also helps when I am having a bad blocked day, that way I experiment with words and try to fit them into a scene to express an overrall mood.
 
 |  |  |