| 
 
 | 
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: |   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 7 | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |  
| 0% | 14% | 0% | 71% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |  |   
    | Weighed
      Average (?):  (4/10) |   
    | Average 
      Rating:  (4/10) |   
    | Highest 
      Rating:  (5/10) |   
    | Lowest 
      Rating:  (2/10) |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    agirlsfantasy
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Feb 1, 2010 |   
    |  | I was truly expecting more, even with the low ratings.  Quite short and no life to the characters, or to the story really.  Needs more.  I agree with another reviewer, it is like a fast to the point porn flick. (4/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    mkemse
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Apr 18, 2005 |   
    |  | I read read the story and was really disappoint, i expect champaigne but got cheap wine instead (5/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    JonBlacker
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Oct 19, 2004 |   
    |  | It needs some more life in the characters. (4/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    Wyn
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Feb 16, 2004 |   
    |  | This story, to me is like an all-sex porno, with not plot or story development. A person who is looking for a quickie sex story may enjoy it though, but not me. (4/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    ladys_maid
  (Edit) | Rating:  | May 15, 2003 |   
    |  | This is an OK story - there is no particular charaterization or plot development but, then again, it is a very short story. The main problem, though, is lack of build-up and detail, which left me rather cold. (4/10) 
 |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    tattoo
  (Edit) | Rating:  | May 5, 2002 |   
    |  | lame (4/10) 
 |  |  |